Monday, November 8, 2010

Painkillers 'risky in pregnancy'

Prolonged use of paracetamol and other painkillers during pregnancy may pose a health risk to baby boys, warn experts.

Research suggests the drugs increase the risk of undescended testicles in male babies, a condition linked to infertility and cancer in later life.

Doctors already advise pregnant women to avoid taking painkillers if possible to protect their unborn child.

Experts said the Human Reproduction journal findings warranted further research "as a matter of priority".

But they reassured women that taking the occasional painkiller for a headache should not cause any harm.

Current advice from the NHS is that women should avoid taking medicines while pregnant but that paracetamol is considered safe if used in small doses for short-term pain relief.

Yet more than half of pregnant women in Europe and the US report taking mild painkillers.

"Start Quote

Clearly further research is needed as a matter of priority"

End Quote Dr Allan Pacey Andrology expert at Sheffield University

In this latest investigation, researchers from Denmark, Finland and France studied more than 2,000 pregnant women and their babies.

They found those women who used more than one painkiller simultaneously, such as paracetamol and ibuprofen, had a seven-fold increased risk of giving birth to sons with some form of undescended testes, or cryptorchidism, compared to women who took nothing.

The second trimester - 14 to 27 weeks of pregnancy - appeared to be a particularly sensitive time.

Increased risk

Any analgesic use at this point in the pregnancy was linked to more than double the risk of cryptorchidism.

Of the individual painkillers, ibuprofen and aspirin use were linked with a quadrupled risk.

Paracetamol alone also appeared to raise the risk, although this result was not statistically significant.

Simultaneous use of more than one painkiller, including paracetamol, during the second trimester increased the risk 16-fold.

Taking painkillers for more than two weeks at a time also appeared to raise the risk significantly.

The researchers suspect that painkillers upset the natural balance of male hormones at work in unborn baby boys and this hinders normal development. Studies of rats back this theory.

Analysis

<!-- pullout-items--> <!-- pullout-body-->

This large study, while interesting is not without limitations.

Of the individual painkillers, ibuprofen and aspirin approximately quadrupled the risk of cryptorchidism. Paracetamol doubled the risk, but the was not statistically significant.

This suggests that a link between paracetamol use in pregnancy and male fertility problems is not clear-cut.

Pregnant women who are alarmed by these studies should note:

It is only prolonged use that has an effect, and most women in this study who used paracetamol did not have a baby boy with cryptorchidism.

<!-- pullout-links-->

Dr Henrik Leffers, senior scientist at Rigshospitalet in Copenhagen, who led the research, said: "If exposure to endocrine disruptors is the mechanism behind the increasing reproductive problems among young men in the Western world, this research suggests that particular attention should be paid to the use of mild analgesics during pregnancy, as this could be a major reason for the problems."

Despite some limitations in the study - not all of the women may have accurately recalled how often they took painkillers, for example - the researchers say their findings suggest that advice to pregnant women on analgesic use should be reconsidered.

They called for more research into the link.

Dr Allan Pacey, senior lecturer in andrology at the University of Sheffield, said: "Scientists have been concerned for some time about chemicals that the mother may be exposed to during pregnancy having the potential to cause reproductive problems in male babies.

"However, there are relatively few concrete examples and much of the work to date has been theoretical.

"That makes these studies somewhat alarming as I doubt that anyone would have suspected that common painkillers would have these effects.

"Clearly further research is needed as a matter of priority."

Dr Basky Thilaganathan of the Royal College of Obstetricians and Gynaecologists said the findings needed to be interpreted with caution. For example, he explained: "The study shows an association rather than causation; it is entirely possible that mothers took these analgesics for an ailment, for example, a viral infection, in pregnancy that may have been the real cause for the noted problems."

Cryptorchidism affects about one in 20 boys in the UK.



Powered by WizardRSS | Full Text RSS Feeds

Stafford Hospital inquiry begins

<!-- Embedding the video player --> <!-- This is the embedded player component -->
<!-- embedding script -->
<!-- companion banner --> <!-- END - companion banner --><!-- caption -->

Frank and Janet Robinson's son John died after being mis-diagnosed and discharged

<!-- END - caption -->
<!-- end of the embedded player component --> <!-- Player embedded -->

A public inquiry into the scandal-hit Stafford Hospital is due to open later, years after campaigners first demanded an open hearing.

A 2009 report condemned conditions at the hospital, said to have caused hundreds of unnecessary deaths.

The last government ordered a private investigation, but refused a wider public inquiry.

But in June the coalition government said the families of those who died deserved to know what went wrong.

The problems at Stafford Hospital - run by the Mid Staffordshire NHS Trust - were first exposed by the NHS regulator in March 2009.

The Healthcare Commission said there had been hundreds more deaths than there should have been between 2005 and 2008.

Catalogue of failings

It listed a catalogue of failings, including cases where untrained A&E receptionists had assessed emergency cases.

The Labour government then launched several investigations.

These included an independent inquiry, led by Robert Francis QC. However, this was held in private and did not have the power to compel witnesses to give evidence.

When it reported in February it said the trust had been driven by targets and cost-cutting.

Managers had been focused on winning elite foundation trust status during the problem years.

But campaigners said the failings went far wider than the hospital itself, and that the broader NHS and regulators should have realised there were problems and stepped in.

They demanded a full public inquiry with stronger legal powers.

In June, Health Secretary Andrew Lansley announced that Robert Francis would continue the work he had already done on investigating the hospital by leading just such an inquiry.

Mr Lansley said this would focus on how the culture in the NHS had allowed the failings to happen.

He said the families of patients who suffered at the hospital deserved to know that.

The inquiry will consider more than a million pages of evidence and will hear from dozens of witnesses.

Hoping for answers

Campaigners are hoping they will now get some of the answers they have been seeking for years.

They want to hear from the chief executive who was in charge at the time, as well as senior managers from the NHS in Staffordshire and Whitehall, and former health ministers.

Julie Bailey, who set up the campaign group Cure the NHS, said it was an important day for her.

"It means such a lot to us," she said. "I hope this will lead to a big culture change in the NHS. We deserve to know why it was allowed to happen, and whether it could happen anywhere else."

Stafford Hospital has been working hard to improve patient care over the last 18 months.

The new chief executive, Anthony Sumara, said they had taken on 140 more nurses, improved training, and changed procedures in the areas which had problems.

He welcomed the public inquiry and hoped it would help improve confidence in the hospital.

"It's desperately important for the NHS in general that we get some answers," he said.

He worries that the impending reorganisation of the NHS and a tougher financial climate could provide the ingredients for similar problems to be repeated.

"We need to make sure we don't take our eye off the ball again," he warned.

Have you been affected by the issues raised in this story? You can send us your stories using the form below:



Powered by WizardRSS | Full Text RSS Feeds

Legal aid lost in drug court case

Dozens of families who blame an epilepsy drug for causing birth defects in their children say they are devastated that legal aid to sue its maker has been withdrawn.

Women who took sodium valproate in the 1990s claim they were not given adequate warnings of possible harm.

The Legal Services Commission, which runs legal aid, has concluded the case is not sufficiently likely to succeed.

Manufacturer Sanofi Aventis denies failing to provide proper warnings.

Spina bifida

About 80 families have begun action for damages against the firm, claiming the drug - also known as epilim - caused severe disabilities in children including spina bifida, heart damage and learning difficulties.

BBC health correspondent Adam Brimelow said the refusal of legal aid meant this action, which had been seven years in the planning, now appeared close to falling apart just days before it was due to go to the High Court.

Karen Buck and John Coyle, whose daughter Bridget is severely handicapped, said they were devastated legal aid had been pulled just before the case was due to be heard.

Mr Coyle, from Stanmore in north-west London, told the BBC: "As a family we feel devastated because the case has gone on for over six years and the legal aid have funded it all the way along.

"Everybody has the belief that it [the case] has a better chance of winning than not, and just everybody is devastated that the finances have been pulled."

Bridget's mother took an increased dose of epilim during her pregnancy in 1997/8, but said she was not made aware of any potential risks to her child.

Her daughter has spina bifida, is unable to walk or talk, is herself epileptic, and requires 24-hour care.

Mr Coyle said: "There didn't seem to be any information available at the time Karen fell pregnant about taking epilim in pregnancy.

"I think the information has definitely improved quite a lot. They've become more aware and have accepted more that there are a lot of risks of problems in pregnancy with epilim, I'm not sure the drug company has accepted full responsibility."

Sanofi Aventis said it had sympathy for the claimants but insisted it had always provided appropriate warnings.

The company said it regularly provided authorities with updated safety data.

Epilepsy is the most common serious neurological disorder affecting people of all ages, with one person in 50 expected to develop it at some time in their life.

Sodium valproate is prescribed to people with epilepsy to prevent seizures in the brain.



Powered by WizardRSS | Full Text RSS Feeds

Friday, November 5, 2010

Vitamin E linked to stroke risk

Taking vitamin E could slightly increase the risk of a particular type of stroke, a study says.

The British Medical Journal study found that for every 1,250 people there is the chance of one extra haemorrhagic stroke - bleeding in the brain.

Researchers from France, Germany and the US studied nine previous trials and nearly 119,000 people.

But the level at which vitamin E becomes harmful is still unknown, experts say.

The study was carried out at Harvard Medical School, Boston, and INSERM in Paris.

Haemorrhagic strokes are the least common type and occur when a weakened blood vessel supplying the brain ruptures and causes brain damage.

Researchers found that vitamin E increased the risk of this kind of stroke by 22%.

The study also found that vitamin E could actually cut the risk of ischaemic strokes - the most common type of stroke - by 10%.

Ischaemic strokes account for 70% of all cases and happen when a blood clot prevents blood reaching the brain.

Experts found vitamin E could cut the risk, equivalent to one ischaemic stroke prevented per 476 people taking the vitamin.

Lifestyle check

However, they warned that keeping to a healthy lifestyle and maintaining low blood pressure and low cholesterol have a far bigger effect on cutting the risk of ischaemic stroke than taking vitamin E.

More than 111,000 people have a stroke every year and they are the third biggest cause of death in the UK.

"Start Quote

Indiscriminate widespread use of vitamin E should be cautioned against.""

End Quote Study authors

Those who survive are frequently left with disability.

While none of the trials suggested that taking vitamin E increased the risk for total stroke, the differences were notable for the two individual types of strokes.

The authors concluded: "Given the relatively small risk reduction of ischaemic stroke and the generally more severe outcome of haemorrhagic stroke, indiscriminate widespread use of vitamin E should be cautioned against."

Previous studies have suggested that taking vitamin E can protect the heart from coronary heart disease, but some have also found that the vitamin could increase the risk of death if taken in high doses.

Dr Peter Coleman, deputy director of research at The Stroke Association, said: "This is a very interesting study that shows that the risk of haemorrhagic stroke can be slightly increased by high levels of orally taken Vitamin E, although what is a high level has not clearly been ascertained.

"More research is required to discover the mechanism of action and the level at which Vitamin E can become harmful.

"We urge people to maintain a lifestyle of a balanced diet, regular exercise and monitoring their blood pressure to reduce their risk of a stroke but would be very interested in seeing further research into this study," he said.



Powered by WizardRSS | Full Text RSS Feeds

Electric current &#39;boosts maths&#39;

<!-- Embedding the video player --> <!-- This is the embedded player component -->
<!-- embedding script -->
<!-- companion banner --> <!-- END - companion banner --><!-- caption -->

The BBC's Fergus Walsh applies an electric current to his brain

<!-- END - caption -->
<!-- end of the embedded player component --> <!-- Player embedded -->

Applying a tiny electrical current to the brain could make you better at learning maths, according to Oxford University scientists.

They found that targeting a part of the brain called the parietal lobe improved the ability of volunteers to solve numerical problems.

They hope the discovery could help people with dyscalculia, who may struggle with numbers.

Another expert said effects on other brain functions would need checking.

The findings are reported in the journal Current Biology.

"Start Quote

We are not advising people to go around giving themselves electric shocks"

End Quote Dr Cohen Kadosh

Some studies have suggested that up to one in five people have trouble with maths, affecting not just their ability to complete problems but also to manage everyday activities such as telling the time and managing money.

Neuroscientists believe that activity within the parietal lobe plays a crucial role in this ability, or the lack of it.

When magnetic fields were used in earlier research to disrupt electrical activity in this part of the brain, previously numerate volunteers temporarily developed discalculia, finding it much harder to solve maths problems.

Persistent benefits

The latest research goes a step further, using a one milliamp current to stimulate the parietal lobe of a small number of students.

The current could not be felt, and had no measurable effect on other brain functions.

As it was turned on, the volunteers tried to learn a puzzle which involved substituting numbers for symbols.

Those given the current from right to left across the parietal lobe did significantly better when given, compared to those who were given no electrical stimulation.

The direction of the current was important - those given stimulation running in the opposite direction, left to right, did markedly worse at these puzzles than those given no current, with their ability matching that of an average six-year-old.

The effects were not short-lived, either. When the volunteers whose performance improved was re-tested six months later, the benefits appear to have persisted.

There was no wider effect on general maths ability in either group, just on the ability to complete the puzzles learned as the current was applied.

Dr Cohen Kadosh, who led the study, said: "We are not advising people to go around giving themselves electric shocks, but we are extremely excited by the potential of our findings and are now looking into the underlying brain changes.

"We've shown before that we can induce dyscalculia, and now it seems we might be able to make someone better at maths, so we really want to see if we can help people with dyscalculia.

"Electrical stimulation is unlikely to turn you into the next Einstein, but if we're lucky it might be able to help some people to cope better with maths."

Dr Christopher Chambers, from the School of Psychology at Cardiff University, said that the results were "intriguing", and offered the prospect not just of improving numerical skills, but having an impact on a wider range of conditions.

He said: "The ability to tweak activity in parts of the brain, turning it slightly 'up' or 'down' at will, opens the door to treating a range of psychiatric and neurological problems, like compulsive gambling or visual impairments following stroke."

However, he said that the study did not prove that the learning of maths skills was improved, just that the volunteers were better at linking arbitrary numbers and symbols, and he warned that researchers needed to make sure other parts of the brain were unaffected.

"This is still an exciting new piece of research, but if we don't know how selective the effects of brain stimulation are then we don't know what other brain systems could also be affected, either positively or negatively."

Sue Flohr, from the British Dyslexia Association, which also provides support for people with dyscalculia, said the research was welcome.

She said: "It's certainly an under-recognised condition, but it can ruin lives.

"It makes it very hard to do everyday things like shopping or budgeting - you can go into a shop and find you've spent your month's money without realising it."



Powered by WizardRSS | Full Text RSS Feeds

Thursday, November 4, 2010

&#39;Tougher&#39; scrutiny of NHS deaths

All deaths in hospital and within a month of discharge are to be monitored under a new system in England.

The scheme is being introduced in April following the Stafford Hospital scandal when the NHS was accused of being slow to react to the high number of deaths.

There are currently a variety of tracking systems which are used, but only about 80% of deaths are recorded.

The new system - Summary Hospital-level Mortality Indicators - aims to ensure concerns are responded to quickly.

It is being dubbed a "smoke alarm" in that an alert does not guarantee there is definitely something wrong, but that it should be investigated.

Local factors

Monthly data will be published and rises in deaths or a consistently high rate will have to be investigated by the individual trust in conjunction with the regulator.

The system will take into account local factors, such as how ill the patients are, and judge whether the death rate it is within an expected range or above or below it.

It was designed by an expert panel including representatives from leading think-tanks, senior doctors, the health regulator and Dr Foster Intelligence, a private body which tracks death rates.

Ian Dalton, a senior NHS manager who helped design the new system, said: "This is a huge achievement.

"A high SHMI on its owns is not an indication of poor standards of care but it is a trigger to take action.

"Hospital boards across the country have a responsibility to pursue questions and quick action will help to ensure safe care for patients at all times."



Powered by WizardRSS | Full Text RSS Feeds